1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
public function sortDepth():void { var gridItem:GridItem; var start:int = 0, gridLimit:int = GridArray.girdSize - 1, xMark:int = 0, yMark:int = 0, cartMin = 0, depth:int = 0, iterations:int = GridArray.gridSize * 2 - 1; for (var i:int = 0; i < iterations; i++) { cartMin = (i > gridLimit) ? i - gridLimit: start; yMark = cartMin; xMark = (i > gridLimit) ? gridLimit: i; while (xMark >= cartMin) { gridItem = this.gridItems[yMark][xMark] as GridItem; if (gridItem) { this.setChildIndex(gridItem, depth); depth++; } xMark--; yMark++; } } }
Refactorings
No refactoring yet !
Juha Hollanti
August 12, 2008, August 12, 2008 10:28, permalink
Umm, i don't know what you're trying to do. Maybe you could explain your snippet of code a bit more? I kind of got the idea that you're trying to do some 3D stuff, right? Am i close or am i just completely off the map?
ryanmagnon.myopenid.com
August 26, 2008, August 26, 2008 20:35, permalink
Yeah, 2D Isometrics, sort of like "Fake 3D".
So if GridArray.gridSize = 3, then this is what I need in the loops:
yM = 0, xM = 0, depth = 0
yM = 0, xM = 1, depth = 1 / yM = 1, xM = 0, depth = 2
yM = 0, xM = 2, depth = 3 / yM = 1, xM = 1, depth = 4 / yM = 2, xM = 0, depth = 5
yM = 1, xM = 2, depth = 6 / yM = 2, xM = 1, depth = 7
yM = 2, xM = 2, depth = 8
I need to get that same pattern no matter what gridSize is though.
ryanmagnon.myopenid.com
September 2, 2008, September 02, 2008 23:17, permalink
K, I'll add another example...
if GridArray.gridSize = 4 then here's the results I need:
yM = 0, xM = 0, depth = 0
yM = 0, xM = 1, depth = 1 / yM = 1, xM = 0, depth = 2
yM = 0, xM = 2, depth = 3 / yM = 1, xM = 1, depth = 4 / yM = 2, xM = 0, depth = 5
yM = 0, xM = 3, depth = 6 / yM = 1, xM = 2, depth = 7 / yM = 2, xM = 1, depth = 8 / yM = 3, xM = 0, depth = 9
yM = 0, xM = 2, depth = 10 / yM = 1, xM = 1, depth = 11 / yM = 2, xM = 0, depth = 12
yM = 1, xM = 2, depth = 13 / yM = 2, xM = 1, depth = 14
yM = 2, xM = 2, depth = 15
I thought there might be a simpler way to get this pattern.
Is there a simpler way to get xMark and yMark?